Immigration is one of the biggest issues facing California and the nation right now. Turn on the television or open up any newspaper (online in this case) and you will find a story on immigration. A recent article on WashingtonPost.com by William Harless is just one of hundreds of examples. (see full article here). What is rarely reported, however, are the growing number of professions that serve the immigrant community. One of these professions, The California Immigration Consultant, offers a valuable service by, among other things, helping immigrant families obtain and file necessary forms, and notifying them when they are in need of legal assistance. To ensure that only strong applicants enter this profession, the California secretary of state requires that applications obtain a California Immigration Consultant Bond before they are issued a license.
According to Immigration Nation US, Immigration Consultants, “have the knowledge of process and procedures for filing certain immigration documents and is also knowing of available resources for cases that are beyond the capabilities of an immigration consultant. The bulk of work lies in preparing documents, document packages and filings for clients with various and specific immigration needs” More information can also be found at their website.
Pursuant to the new provisions of California Business and Professions Code section 22443.1, however, the bond requirement has doubled and all applicants and renewal’s will have to obtain an $100,000 Immigration Consultant Bond. For more information on the requirements see the California’s Secretary of State website: http://www.sos.ca.gov/business/sf/imm-consultant-qualifications.htm
Despite the increase in bond amount, the profession remains in high demand. California has an immigrant population (naturalized and other) of over 10 million and many of these people need expert help so they legally proceed with the immigration process.
If you wish to receive more information on the California Immigration Consultant Bond or have general questions about the bonding process, please contact one of the Surety Bond Experts at Jurisco. A friendly member of their staff will be there to answer all of your queries.
Two recent trends in California have dramatically altered the landscape of “Landlord/Tenant Relationship”; specifically evictions. The first is the skyrocketing real estate market. The second is the rise of ‘room share’ applications like AirBnB and VRBO. What this means is that there is money to be made and both sides, and owners and renters are out to make it. The unfortunate result of this situation is that more and more tenants are being evicted. (See SFGate.com Article by Carolyn Said for more information: Evictions SF) And the already stressed court system is struggling to make sure the rights of both parties are being recognized. A legal surety safeguard called a Writ of Possession Bond is being required by the courts more and more to ensure that the eviction process goes as smoothly and fairly as possible.
The macro situation is this: some people in California are making piles of money in the real estate market right now. Either through selling property at these historic high prices or from acting as landlords and renting their units at previously unseen levels. Compounding this craze is the emergence of short term rental applications like AirBnB and VRBO which create a new and mostly unregulated market. The conflicts arise when tenants, seeking to make money off of their extra rooms or when they are on vacation, violate lease agreements prohibiting short term rentals. In increasing numbers, landlords then take steps to evict tenants and/or take possession of tenants property to satisfy claims. This is where the aforementioned Writ of Possession and Writ of Possession Bond comes in to play.
As defined by ExpertEvictions.com, a Writ of Possession is, “A document issued by the court after the landlord wins an unlawful detainer. The writ of possession is served on the tenant by the sheriff. The writ informs the tenant that the tenant must leave the rental unit by the end of five days, or the sheriff will forcibly remove the tenant.” A Writ of Possession Bond is used if the plaintiff seeks to take possession of property before a judgment is made. In this case, if the landlord wishes to take possession of the real property before the eviction judgment has been finalized. The bond guarantees that if the Writ of Possession is deemed wrongful and that the tenant’s property has suffered undue harm, the defendant be able to collect damages.
As you can see exploding real estate market in California is leading to all sorts of corollary legal issues. And, like a lot of legal issues, they can be quite confusing. If you ever require more information on a Writ of Possession Bond in California, please contact the Surety Bond experts at Jurisco and a knowledgeable member of their staff will be able to answer all your questions.
A recent article in the New York Times by Jennifer Medina on California labor issues (found here) prompted a question. Do you know where your state stands in regards to labor laws? Not all states are equal. In fact, nationwide, there is significant variation between labor heavy regulations and those that favor the employer. Laws in California, for those of you who didn’t already guess, favor labor. And in 2014, the situation can be labeled ‘more so’. There have been several recent changes to the code but the one I wanted to discuss today is Labor Code 98.2 which covers the appeal process. In order to seek review of a decision, a party has 10 days to file an appeal to the superior court. To successfully file, the appealing parties must post an appeal bond (also known as a undertaking bond) or cash with the superior court in the amount equal to the judgement. Have you ever felt pressed for time? 10 days can feel like an eternity or like a slowly tightening girdle; just squeezing the breath out of you. The 10 day limit to file an appeal is the crux of issue here. Because, no matter what side of the dispute you are on, labor or employer, if you miss the deadline, you have forfeited your opportunity to contest the court’s decision. (For more info on this see Garret Murai’s helpful article on the appeal process: Here) Making the right decisions during the 10 day limit is crucial. Should you appeal? Do you feel strongly about the merits of your claim? How do I procure an Appeal Bond or an Undertaking? Which surety bond company should I choose? The former two questions can only be answered by a thorough examination of the case, preferably done with your attorney. The latter two questions are a little easier to answer. Any surety bond agent you choose should have the ability to turn around your appeal bond requirements in a matter of hours if necessary. They should have the experience to offer the time saving advice that could very well save your appeal. If you have questions about California Labor Code 98.2 or if you want to learn more about the appeal bond or undertaking bond process, please contact the surety bond experts at Jurisco. One of their experiences staff is available to answer any queries you may have.
Legendary College Football coach Bobby Bowden was once asked why his wife wasn’t with him at an awards banquet. His response (paraphrased response): “Well, you just can’t remember everything”. How many of you have ever guilty of losing your keys? The remote? Or, heaven forbid, your cell phone? Show of hands . . . .? By your response it seems universal that things get misplaced. I was browsing around Investopedia today and I came across an interesting page about what happens when someone loses a stock certificate. (See full article here: http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/07/lost_share_certificate.asp) I was suprised to learn that replacing a lost stock certificate is actually easier (and less emotionally painful) than replacing your cell phone. The main reason this is so is because of a surety product called the Lost Stock Certificate Bond or the Lost Instrument Bond.
The Lost Stock Certificate Bond is the linchpin in the stock certificate replacement process. Basically, the bond certifies that, if the original certificate somehow shows up at a later date, the transfer agent and issuing corporation are protected. Without the bond, agents and corporations would have too much risk hanging over their heads and wouldn’t want to issue any new certificates without an insurance policy. The lost stock certificate bond is just this insurance policy.
This is not a process unique to a specific state. Replacing your lost stock certificate is uniform nationwide. That’s right: all 50 states. And to begin the process, the individual must first contact the issuing corporation’s Transfer agent. According to SEC.gov, the transfer agents provide three key functions for the issuing corporations: 1. Issue and cancel certificates to reflect changes in ownership. 2. Act as an intermediary for the company. 3. Handle lost, destroyed, or stolen certificates. (See link: https://www.sec.gov/answers/transferagent.htm for full post and description on each of the three functions.) The easiest way to find the appropriate transfer agent is to contact the corporation’s investor relations office (often found on their website). After contacting the agent, the investor must describe the type of certificate and the amount of loss followed by procuring the aforementioned Lost Stock Certificate Bond. Once this is done, a new certificate will be issued.
See? Not so hard. Way easier than replacing all of those valuable family photos that you have neglected to back up on your phone.
If you have any more questions regarding the Lost Stock Certificate Bond or the process of replacing lost certificates, please contact the friendly and knowledgeable staff at Jurisco.
In California, Professional Guardians play a vital role in the well-being of the state’s elderly and disabled. Let’s face it: In today’s society, Guardians are essential. And with great power comes great responsibility and, also, a greater risk of system abuse. The and that is why there are checks put in place by the California legal system to those in most need of protecting. A Guardianship Bond is one of those checks. Mandatory licensing by the office of the California Consumer Affairs is another (see here for more info: http://www.fiduciary.ca.gov/). The Guardianship bond is required when a person may be deemed incapacitated by the court by either infirmity or age. In these cases, the probate court may appoint a guardian to handle the incapacitated person’s (ward) financial and physical affairs. Requiring a guardianship bond ensures the person is not mistreated or taken advantage of financially.
It has been many years since the tradition structure of family living dissipated. Rarely now do you find three generations of a family living together and and rarely do parents have the time or resources to care for the permanently disabled. Things that used to be common are now the exception. And families must trust strangers to care for grampa. A story I recently read on SantaCruz.com by author Georgia Perry got me thinking about this. (See story here: http://www.santacruz.com/2012/07/31/guardianship_case_highlights_plight_of_elderly/)
Loved ones shouldn’t be frightened by the occasional bad story. Rather, they should be careful. Because, by and large, California’s Professional Guardians are a wonderful and trustworthy group. And they care they provide can make you life, and the life of a disabled loved one, so much better.
If you are looking for a professional guardian or are already a Fiduciary and are interested in learning more about the requirements for a Guardianship Bond in California, please contact the bond experts at Jurisco and their helpful staff will provide you with all the information you require.
We at Jurisco know that the construction industry in California is humming again. New projects, both public and private are being executed all over the state. And so largely gone are the days where shrinking fund availability leads to many unpaid (and unhappy) contractors. Largely gone but not completely. Every day in California, aggrieved contractors are using lie remedies to collect on what they are owed. The two available in this state are the ‘Mechanic’s Lien’ and the lesser used ‘Stop Payment Notice’. What many people may not know is that a Stop Payment Notice Bond must be filed along with the Stop Payment Notice. This Surety Bond protects the lender and the prime contractor from any monies withheld wrongfully. The bond must be in the amount of 125% of the claim.
For those of you who wish to learn more about the the Mechanic’s Lien and the Stop Payment Notice remedies, please see this wonderful article: http://www.zlien.com/articles/the-differences-between-a-stop-notice-and-a-mechanics-lien/ Mr. Wolfe provides a very clear explanation; and attempting to best his efforts would be a waste of my energy. I will summarize, though. A Stop Notice is used when a subcontractor or supplier has not been paid for their goods or services. The Stop Notice requires the lending authority to withhold future payments to the general contractor in the amount described in the Stop Notice claim. This is only done, however, if the Claimant has procured a stop payment notice bond to be filed with the claim. The lender will only withhold money if the notice is bonded. (More information on the Stop Payment Notice requirements in sections 3083 and 3103 in the California Civil Code)
I could muddy the waters by also describing the other bond that can be used as a remedy to the lender; called the Release of Stop Payment Notice Bond. But I’ll save that for another post. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding Stop Payment Notice Bonds or any other surety bond matter, please contact the bond experts at Jurisco and an actual human being will answer all your queries.
At Jurisco, Injunction Bonds in California, are part of our daily life and a recent post on worldipreview.com (an intellectual property issues online publication) is especially pertinent to our mission. Before going into to more detail, let me pose a few questions: Have you ever seen someone hawking high priced luxury goods on the street for mind blowingly good deals? Or (in case that you’ve never been to a big city) have you ever seen luxury goods such as Cartier, Chloe, Rolex, Prada and Alfred Dunhill advertised online for rock bottom prices? If you answered yes to either of these questions then you have been exposed to the economy of counterfeit luxury goods. This aforementioned article (see full post here) goes into detail on the counterfeit goods industry and the fallout when Lawful Patent holders sue companies sue over claims of counterfeiting and patent/trademark infringement.
What make the case outlined in the article really fascinating is that the presiding Judge of US district court, Central California District, also allowed for the websites selling the counterfeit goods to also be held liable since they knowingly sold hawked products! Crazy. And an Injunction was slapped on the websites (named are: tradekey.com, saudicommerce.com and b2bfreezone.com) preventing them from selling any known fake goods bearing the plaintiff’s marks.
For those know don’t know, Injunctions are defined (by Cornell Law Online) as: A court order requiring a person to do or cease doing a specific action.They are issued early in a lawsuit to maintain the status quo by preventing a defendant from becoming insolvent or to stop the defendant from continuing his or her allegedly harmful actions. The ‘harmful actions’ in the case of the counterfeit watches would be the selling of replica products known to be fake. And often an Injunction Bond is required by the court in order for the Injunction to be granted. The Injunction bond protects the defendant from harm if the court decides in favor of the defendant.
California is a hotbed for Injunctions due to the state being the major place of entry for goods from Asia. And the surety bond experts at Jurisco are uniquely experienced to answer any questions regarding civil injunctions for the patent and trademark legal community. For for information on California Injunction Bonds, please contact Jurisco and their friendly staff will answer any of your questions.
Recently a colleague told me harrowing story about how he was delayed from selling his house due to a bizarre statutory requirement. How many of you loyal Jurisco Surety Bond blog followers have ever heard of Reconveyance? Ok, don’t answer, some of you are probably attorneys or other Surety Bond blog authors. But for those of you not already braised by the sharp heat of legal and lending esoteria . . . see if you can follow along while I reconstruct a story told to me by a California Title Attorney.
So, my friend inherited a house from his parents in Los Angeles, California and since he had no use for it as a rental property he wished to sell it. As far as he knew the title was clear. Evidently not so. He soon learned that the selling process was being held up because his parents, although having paid off two debts related to house in the 1970’s, had never actually received the Reconveyance (also known as the trust deed or the deed of trust) This is proof that the debt has been fully satisfied. Without one it creates a title chaos and puts uncertainty on the title because there is no official document that shows loan has been paid. This should be simple, right? Just call the bank and ask for the appropriate paper work. Evidently not so simple. Both lending organizations were no longer in business and, after much searching, all my friend could find of these companies were the descendants of the company owners. The omissions of our forebears were having a very real impact on the lives of their kin. These descendants could still legally provide the reconveyance documents and trust deeds but they then take on a risk issuing the documents out of the blue because of the high risk of fraud. An immovable impasse, right? Evidently not so. Because my friend, the one seeking the reconveyance, could procure a surety bond (named Reconveyance Bond or trust deed bond or deed of trust bond) that would protect the lender or the agent of the lender from fraud or illegal actions perpetrated by the party requesting the Reconveyance.
Reconveyance Bond particulars and requirements are elucidated in California Civil Code Section 2941.7 . And see these articles on CNN.com and Escrowhelp.com for more information on reconveyance:
The Reconveyance bond (deed of trust bond or trust deed bond) are the only instruments protecting institutions and individuals alike from lawlessness, fraud and the kind of irresponsible record keeping that can only result from feckless nepotism. The Surety Bond experts at Jurisco know this and are always there to answer your questions about reconveyance bonds, other surety bonds or how to make California a better place through fine accounting and contractual accountability. Contact of their knowledgeable and friendly staff members today.
An interesting and in-depth article written by California Appellate Law Expert and Super Lawyer, John Derrick, titled “The Civil Appeals Process”, got me thinking about the role of defendant’s bonds in today’s court system. (see John’s full article: here) Specifically, the article got me thinking how defendant’s bonds (i.e. appeal bonds or stay bonds) are a vital and often little understood part of California’s legal universe.
In most instances obtaining a defendant bond is statutorily mandated by courts during an appeal proceeding in a civil court. Called either an appeal bond or supersedeas bond, these legal mechanisms are required by statute for the appeal of a money judgment. These surety bonds guarantee the judgment will be satisfied along with court costs. Surety bond cost varies by state but usually includes a provision for interest.
Appeal Bonds are widely used but not the only available option for a defendant. There are several other defendant bonds offered by Jurisco. Keep checking in to this blog explanations of the defendants bonds listed below:
When you are in need of a appeal bond in California or (or any of the 50 states) or if you have any questions, contact the bond experts at Jurisco and they will answer any of your questions.
“Simply put, money can be divided but children cannot” This line, by Jeff Landers on Forbes.com, speaks to the extra layer of difficulty when a divorcing couple have children. The article, however, speaks more to the extra (extra!) layer of difficulty when one member of the divorcing couple has an international passport. (see full post here) Just as the title of the article implies, (Small World, Big Problem: Divorces Involving Dual Citizenship) it may feel like the world is shrinking but the problems created by international divorces seem very big. Hopefully, this article on Ne Exeat Bonds in California will show you that there are other options.
Like the article posits, international divorce problems are very real; this is especially true in a multi-cultural, international, state like California where medium-to high-wealth individuals from all over the world move to seeking high-paying jobs. Divorced parties are concerned (and rightfully so), when their spouse leaves to another country with their children, that it will be be difficult and near impossible to enforce the tenets of the divorce agreement (including custody rights) in a country outside the jurisdiction of the US Department of Justice. They are right for feeling this way. Once outside the US, enforcing laws is not only problematic but very expensive.
Jurisco Court Surety in California is here to present you with a remedy for this situation, however, and more and more parents are seeking it in order to quell their fears regarding international divorce and custody rights. In Family Law this is such a surety bond called a ‘Ne Exeat Bond’ (Obvious translation: No Leaving); and this bond is used as a guarantee that the party wishing to leave the US with the children of a dual custody divorce will uphold the mutually signed divorce agreement. A little confused: Lets try an example: Parties A&B are a divorced couple currently living in the US with shared custody of children. Party A has a Euro Passport and wishes to move to France and take the kids with them. Party B doesn’t trust that they will have their legally guaranteed access to the children once Party is outside of US legal Jurisdiction. The presiding Judge decides that the safest route is to make Party A procure a “Ne Exeat Bond” and post it with the court. Party A is forbidden to leave the country until doing so. The dollar amount of the ‘Ne Exeat Bond’ is set at estimated cost Party B will incur pursuing legal action in France if Party A doesn’t live up to their end of the divorce agreement. To procure this bond, Party A will have to show proof of international address, likely job, family members in the destination country and other evidence that proves they are indeed moving where they say. Nobody like divorce, but Party B sleeps better knowing that their access to their children is being protected.
Need more information? Contact an actual person at Jurisco who can immediately help you with a Ne Exeat bond application in California or who can answer any questions you may have regarding any Surety Bond. In California or any other state.