<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jurisco Court Surety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jurisco.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jurisco.com</link>
	<description>The Experts in Lawyers Surety</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California Injuction Bond</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/california-injuction-bond/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/california-injuction-bond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Surety Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunction bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunction.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making a lot of news lately are high profile patent infringement lawsuits coming out of silicon Valley.  Clearly one of the biggest (and what The Wall Street Journal termed “The Patent Trial of the Century) was Apple’s suit against rival Samsung.  Though this case made international news what a lot of people don’t recognize is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/california-injuction-bond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shield Act and Injunction Bonds in California</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/shield-act-surety-bonds/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/shield-act-surety-bonds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunction bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shield Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bonds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New proposed federal legislation would affect patent litigation in California and injunction proceedings.  U.S. House Resolution 6245, or popularly known as the S.H.I.E.L.D Act (Saving High-tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes) would require patent holders defined as Non Producing Entities (NPE) to  pay for the defendants legal fees if the patent infringement case is found [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/shield-act-surety-bonds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes to California Civil Code and the impact on Surety Bonds</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/california-civil-code-affects-surety-bonds/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/california-civil-code-affects-surety-bonds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 12:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Surety Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leglislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California&#8217;s legislature is in session.  And like every year there are a host of proposed changes to the legal code in California, both civil and probate.  For instance, Senate Bill 156 (SB-156) would challenge an attorney’s ability to collect fees from the management of a conservatorship.  From the bill text, “This bill would … limit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/california-civil-code-affects-surety-bonds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Claim and Delivery Bond</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/california-claim-delivery-bond/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/california-claim-delivery-bond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Surety Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim and delivery bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creditor's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replevin bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sad result of the ‘the great recession of 2008’ is that many people fell behind in their auto loans.  In the aftermath, many vehicles were repossessed by the crediting institutions.   And with the large population and all the car friendly scenery, California has seen a big upswing in the number of automobiles repossessed over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/california-claim-delivery-bond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surety bond vs. Cash Deposit with the Court:  Explained</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/surety-bond-vs-cash-deposit-court-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/surety-bond-vs-cash-deposit-court-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on Florida Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Surety Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collateral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superior courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Civil Cases when a surety bond is statutorily required, or deemed necessary by the judge, the principle has two options:  1) to  procure a surety bond or 2)  deposit cash in the amount of the bond with the court.  In what scenarios does it make sense to obtain a surety bond and when does [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/surety-bond-vs-cash-deposit-court-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professional Fiduciaries and bonds in California</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/proffessional-fiduciaries-california/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/proffessional-fiduciaries-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 12:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Surety Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guardianship bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal representative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that in 2007 the California legislature passed into law  the Professional Fiduciaries Act and as of January 1st 2009 it became necessary for any fiduciary to be licensed if they were to legally operate in the state.  In the legal world a Fiduciary is defined as, “An individual in whom another has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/proffessional-fiduciaries-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do Surety Bonds Require Collateral?</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/surety-bonds-require-collateral/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/surety-bonds-require-collateral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Surety Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collateral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defendant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiff bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post, we explored the topic of defendants bonds and appeal bonds in particular.  In upcoming posts we will define in more detail other kinds of defendants bonds.  For this post, however, the surety bond experts at Jurisco will be answering the question that many attorneys ask when they are required to procure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/surety-bonds-require-collateral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Appeal Bond</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/california-defendants-bonds/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/california-defendants-bonds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Surety Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond explanation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defendants bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supersedeas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond definition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often times surety bonds are used in cases to protect an enjoined party from wrongful civil actions.  These generally fall under the category of plaintiff bonds.  However there is also a list of surety bonds used as good faith measures so certain legal actions can be delayed.  These are called defendants bonds.  Over the coming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/california-defendants-bonds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Filing Surety Bonds in California</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/e-filing-surety-bonds-california/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/e-filing-surety-bonds-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Surety Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American LegalNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiff bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rapid Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bonds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that the electronic filing (E filing) of certain civil court documents is available (and sometimes mandatory) in counties and judicial districts all over California?  Its true.  Pursuant to amendments in the California Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6, civil court documents can be filed easily and efficiently from your office.  In Orange [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/e-filing-surety-bonds-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Attachment Bond</title>
		<link>http://jurisco.com/california-attachment-bond-2/</link>
		<comments>http://jurisco.com/california-attachment-bond-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hanlewr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles on California Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Surety Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attachment bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond application]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisco.com/?p=1731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many reasons why a plaintiff would seek a prejudgment Writ of Attachment in a civil proceeding; and there are valid reasons why seeking to attach in a civil proceeding is not a good tactic.  California has strict statutory regulations regarding a claimant seeking to attach so it is important to weigh the value [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurisco.com/california-attachment-bond-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
